United States Presidential election7 Nov 2028in 729 days Senate D 97% House D 58% Calendar Track record Research
Closest results
Election 1940 Results

Each election opens in its own mode: the forecast before the votes are counted, the live count while races are still too close to call, and the results once every race is decided.

1940 US Senate election in Texas

Tom Connally (Democrat) beat George I. Shannon (Republican) in Texas in 1940, 94.2% to 5.7%, a margin of 88.5 points and 918,755 votes.

The Democratic hold continued from 1934, when Tom Connally also won.

Democrats led in 225 of the 225 counties as they stood then. The largest, Harris, cast 94,024 votes and went to the Democrat by 89.5 points. The closest was Loving, where 114 votes separated the two parties.

United States
If only voted How this works
If the polls miss like

Early projection, based on early and incomplete polling: the likely matchups, each weighted by the betting markets' odds of both nominations, not a result. Each county is its 2024 presidential margin moved by its state's projected swing; set a national vote and every state, district and county moves by the same amount from our projection. Colours run in 100 steps from a safe Republican to a safe Democratic margin. Boundaries: US Census Bureau.

Senate

CandidatePartyVotesShare
Tom Connally won Democratic 978,095 94.2%
George I. Shannon Republican 59,340 5.7%
All other candidates 408 0.0%
Total1,037,843

Every county

CountyDemocratRepublicanOthersTotalMargin
Harris 89,065 94.7% 4,936 5.2% 23 94,024 D+89.5
Dallas 57,569 87.4% 8,273 12.6% 36 65,878 D+74.8
Bexar 46,566 82.5% 9,809 17.4% 63 56,438 D+65.1
Tarrant 41,849 95.6% 1,902 4.3% 7 43,758 D+91.3
Jefferson 23,677 95.2% 1,166 4.7% 16 24,859 D+90.6
Travis 20,040 96.7% 685 3.3% 2 20,727 D+93.4
McCulloch 17,314 96.4% 640 3.6% 17,954 D+92.9
El Paso 14,857 92.4% 1,215 7.6% 5 16,077 D+84.9
Grayson 13,365 95.7% 604 4.3% 1 13,970 D+91.3
Wichita 13,116 94.9% 709 5.1% 13,825 D+89.7
Galveston 12,806 93.8% 842 6.2% 6 13,654 D+87.6
Nueces 12,301 95.3% 595 4.6% 5 12,901 D+90.7
Hidalgo 11,178 90.4% 1,182 9.6% 12,360 D+80.9
Smith 10,622 96.7% 363 3.3% 1 10,986 D+93.4
Gregg 10,002 91.3% 940 8.6% 9 10,951 D+82.8
Cameron 8,674 91.1% 845 8.9% 4 9,523 D+82.2
Potter 8,661 91.3% 827 8.7% 3 9,491 D+82.5
Lubbock 9,124 96.9% 292 3.1% 4 9,420 D+93.8
Hunt 8,668 95.3% 365 4.0% 63 9,096 D+91.3
Taylor 8,538 97.5% 219 2.5% 8,757 D+95.0
Rusk 8,446 97.2% 242 2.8% 8,688 D+94.4
Bell 8,320 97.7% 198 2.3% 1 8,519 D+95.3
Lamar 8,345 98.0% 167 2.0% 1 8,513 D+96.1
Ellis 8,341 98.0% 171 2.0% 8,512 D+96.0
Collin 8,009 95.2% 401 4.8% 1 8,411 D+90.5
Navarro 8,171 97.3% 231 2.7% 8,402 D+94.5
Fannin 7,931 96.3% 301 3.7% 3 8,235 D+92.7
Bowie 7,707 96.2% 308 3.8% 8,015 D+92.3
Williamson 7,439 96.4% 277 3.6% 3 7,719 D+92.8
Tom Green 7,218 95.5% 341 4.5% 7,559 D+91.0
Denton 7,012 95.9% 302 4.1% 7,314 D+91.7
Eastland 6,658 95.6% 305 4.4% 2 6,965 D+91.2
Angelina 6,433 97.9% 134 2.0% 1 6,568 D+95.9
Cherokee 5,970 97.6% 142 2.3% 2 6,114 D+95.3
Johnson 5,945 97.3% 166 2.7% 6,111 D+94.6
Anderson 5,887 97.2% 167 2.8% 1 6,055 D+94.5
Cooke 5,486 93.8% 363 6.2% 5,849 D+87.6
Van Zandt 5,583 96.9% 177 3.1% 1 5,761 D+93.8
Kaufman 5,335 96.6% 186 3.4% 1 5,522 D+93.2
Gray 5,109 92.7% 403 7.3% 1 5,513 D+85.4
Hopkins 5,245 97.2% 152 2.8% 5,397 D+94.4
Nacogdoches 5,239 97.7% 121 2.3% 1 5,361 D+95.5
Limestone 5,282 98.5% 77 1.4% 1 5,360 D+97.1
Milam 5,128 97.6% 121 2.3% 3 5,252 D+95.3
Brown 5,082 97.4% 132 2.5% 2 5,216 D+94.9
Shelby 4,986 98.2% 92 1.8% 5,078 D+96.4
Fayette 4,702 93.2% 340 6.7% 1 5,043 D+86.5
Falls 4,749 95.3% 234 4.7% 4,983 D+90.6
Webb 4,727 95.2% 237 4.8% 2 4,966 D+90.4
Guadalupe 3,736 77.4% 1,084 22.5% 4 4,824 D+55.0
Howard 4,714 98.0% 96 2.0% 1 4,811 D+96.0
Brazos 4,664 97.5% 119 2.5% 4,783 D+95.0
Wharton 4,586 96.5% 168 3.5% 4,754 D+92.9
Brazoria 4,351 94.9% 236 5.1% 4,587 D+89.7
Erath 4,314 96.4% 162 3.6% 4,476 D+92.8
Red River 4,181 96.1% 169 3.9% 4,350 D+92.2
Hale 4,118 95.7% 185 4.3% 4,303 D+91.4
Wood 4,130 96.9% 128 3.0% 2 4,260 D+93.9
Parker 4,053 95.2% 203 4.8% 2 4,258 D+90.4
Wise 4,112 96.9% 132 3.1% 1 4,245 D+93.8
Jones 4,132 98.5% 63 1.5% 4,195 D+97.0
Caldwell 4,091 98.0% 84 2.0% 4,175 D+96.0
Young 4,046 97.2% 116 2.8% 4,162 D+94.4
Hutchinson 3,818 92.4% 312 7.6% 1 4,131 D+84.9
Palo Pinto 3,959 96.7% 135 3.3% 4,094 D+93.4
Houston 3,885 97.0% 120 3.0% 4,005 D+94.0
Wilbarger 3,852 96.8% 128 3.2% 3,980 D+93.6
Freestone 3,841 96.5% 138 3.5% 3,979 D+93.1
Liberty 3,808 96.0% 157 4.0% 3,965 D+92.1
Runnels 3,787 96.1% 126 3.2% 26 3,939 D+92.9
Montague 3,779 96.9% 117 3.0% 4 3,900 D+93.9
Lavaca 3,693 95.1% 189 4.9% 3,882 D+90.3
Fort Bend 3,750 96.9% 120 3.1% 3,870 D+93.8
Comanche 3,770 98.0% 77 2.0% 1 3,848 D+96.0
Nolan 3,729 97.6% 91 2.4% 3,820 D+95.2
Coleman 3,653 96.7% 125 3.3% 3,778 D+93.4
Lamb 3,604 95.6% 166 4.4% 3,770 D+91.2
Montgomery 3,687 97.9% 81 2.1% 3,768 D+95.7
Gonzales 3,634 97.6% 89 2.4% 3,723 D+95.2
Bosque 3,555 96.7% 120 3.3% 3,675 D+93.5
Coryell 3,445 97.7% 82 2.3% 3,527 D+95.4
Upshur 3,225 94.0% 205 6.0% 3,430 D+88.0
Duval 3,353 98.5% 52 1.5% 3,405 D+96.9
Orange 3,329 97.9% 69 2.0% 1 3,399 D+95.9
Robertson 3,342 98.5% 50 1.5% 3,392 D+97.1
Wilson 3,268 97.3% 90 2.7% 2 3,360 D+94.6
Haskell 3,242 96.6% 114 3.4% 3,356 D+93.2
Victoria 3,043 91.1% 296 8.9% 1 3,340 D+82.2
Washington 3,235 97.1% 96 2.9% 3,331 D+94.2
Gillespie 1,984 60.0% 1,315 39.8% 9 3,308 D+20.2
Stephens 3,153 97.0% 95 2.9% 2 3,250 D+94.1
Hardin 3,179 98.2% 59 1.8% 3,238 D+96.4
Dawson 3,102 97.6% 76 2.4% 3,178 D+95.2
Ector 3,116 100.0% 0 0.0% 3,116 D+100.0
Panola 3,065 98.9% 35 1.1% 3,100 D+97.7
Childress 3,010 97.6% 74 2.4% 3,084 D+95.2
Kerr 2,337 76.2% 728 23.8% 3,065 D+52.5
Bastrop 2,952 97.8% 67 2.2% 3,019 D+95.6
Jim Wells 2,882 96.7% 98 3.3% 1 2,981 D+93.4
Wheeler 2,786 93.9% 181 6.1% 1 2,968 D+87.8
Lynn 2,799 97.0% 86 3.0% 2,885 D+94.0
Hamilton 2,794 97.1% 84 2.9% 2,878 D+94.2
Hays 2,772 97.2% 79 2.8% 2,851 D+94.5
Colorado 2,623 92.4% 216 7.6% 2,839 D+84.8
Clay 2,703 96.7% 93 3.3% 2,796 D+93.3
Bee 2,708 97.2% 76 2.7% 1 2,785 D+94.5
Austin 2,647 95.1% 136 4.9% 1 2,784 D+90.2
Mitchell 2,657 97.8% 58 2.1% 3 2,718 D+95.6
Hockley 2,605 97.6% 64 2.4% 2,669 D+95.2
Uvalde 2,550 95.8% 109 4.1% 2 2,661 D+91.7
Karnes 2,563 97.4% 69 2.6% 2,632 D+94.8
Midland 2,476 95.5% 116 4.5% 2,592 D+91.0
Matagorda 2,446 94.4% 145 5.6% 2,591 D+88.8
San Saba 2,491 98.7% 32 1.3% 2,523 D+97.5
Scurry 2,523 100.0% 0 0.0% 2,523 D+100.0
Comal 2,214 87.9% 300 11.9% 6 2,520 D+76.0
Fisher 2,448 98.4% 41 1.6% 2,489 D+96.7
Grimes 2,443 98.2% 44 1.8% 2,487 D+96.5
Burnet 2,394 97.6% 58 2.4% 1 2,453 D+95.2
Hall 2,396 97.7% 56 2.3% 2,452 D+95.4
Floyd 2,308 96.3% 79 3.3% 10 2,397 D+93.0
Jasper 2,336 97.7% 56 2.3% 2,392 D+95.3
Walker 2,355 98.6% 34 1.4% 2,389 D+97.2
Atascosa 2,281 96.4% 83 3.5% 2 2,366 D+92.9
Burleson 2,271 96.9% 73 3.1% 2,344 D+93.8
Jack 2,247 95.9% 96 4.1% 2,343 D+91.8
Collingsworth 2,233 96.8% 75 3.2% 2,308 D+93.5
Ward 2,189 96.5% 77 3.4% 3 2,269 D+93.1
Lampasas 2,201 97.5% 56 2.5% 2,257 D+95.0
Terry 2,215 98.1% 42 1.9% 2,257 D+96.3
Archer 2,093 96.7% 72 3.3% 2,165 D+93.3
Randall 2,083 96.2% 81 3.7% 1 2,165 D+92.5
Refugio 1,959 93.4% 136 6.5% 3 2,098 D+86.9
Trinity 2,027 97.3% 56 2.7% 2,083 D+94.6
Kleberg 2,024 97.6% 49 2.4% 2,073 D+95.3
Lee 1,904 92.5% 154 7.5% 2,058 D+85.0
Carson 1,918 94.7% 108 5.3% 2,026 D+89.3
Dallam 1,899 94.5% 110 5.5% 1 2,010 D+89.0
Crosby 1,953 97.9% 41 2.1% 1,994 D+95.9
Dickens 1,939 97.6% 47 2.4% 1,986 D+95.3
Newton 1,920 97.9% 42 2.1% 1,962 D+95.7
Pecos 1,869 95.8% 79 4.1% 2 1,950 D+91.8
Mills 1,885 97.4% 50 2.6% 1,935 D+94.8
Tyler 1,851 98.1% 35 1.9% 1,886 D+96.3
Donley 1,842 99.7% 5 0.3% 1,847 D+99.5
Baylor 1,787 98.2% 32 1.8% 1,819 D+96.5
Jackson 1,750 96.8% 57 3.2% 1 1,808 D+93.6
Franklin 1,732 96.1% 70 3.9% 1,802 D+92.2
Cottle 1,678 95.9% 71 4.1% 1,749 D+91.9
Shackelford 1,699 97.5% 44 2.5% 1,743 D+95.0
Llano 1,695 97.7% 39 2.2% 1 1,735 D+95.4
Swisher 1,662 96.2% 66 3.8% 1,728 D+92.4
Deaf Smith 1,595 92.7% 125 7.3% 1,720 D+85.5
Gaines 1,646 96.5% 60 3.5% 1,706 D+93.0
Sabine 1,665 97.8% 38 2.2% 1,703 D+95.5
Kendall 1,133 67.1% 552 32.7% 3 1,688 D+34.4
Rockwall 1,597 99.1% 14 0.9% 1,611 D+98.3
Blanco 1,436 89.2% 171 10.6% 2 1,609 D+78.6
Mason 1,459 92.9% 109 6.9% 3 1,571 D+85.9
Reeves 1,521 96.9% 49 3.1% 1,570 D+93.8
Parmer 1,443 92.5% 117 7.5% 1,560 D+85.0
Camp 1,501 97.1% 45 2.9% 1,546 D+94.2
Winkler 1,477 96.5% 52 3.4% 1 1,530 D+93.1
Chambers 1,451 96.1% 59 3.9% 1,510 D+92.2
Hood 1,441 95.9% 61 4.1% 1,502 D+91.9
Concho 1,436 96.6% 51 3.4% 1,487 D+93.1
Waller 1,387 95.7% 62 4.3% 1,449 D+91.4
Goliad 1,194 84.3% 222 15.7% 1,416 D+68.6
Menard 1,364 96.6% 48 3.4% 1,412 D+93.2
Bailey 1,310 95.5% 62 4.5% 1,372 D+91.0
Live Oak 1,334 99.0% 14 1.0% 1,348 D+97.9
Val Verde 1,079 80.5% 262 19.5% 1,341 D+60.9
Kimble 1,288 96.3% 49 3.7% 1,337 D+92.7
Stonewall 1,294 96.8% 43 3.2% 1,337 D+93.6
Rains 1,226 93.7% 83 6.3% 1,309 D+87.3
Bandera 1,160 89.4% 135 10.4% 2 1,297 D+79.0
Brewster 1,235 96.0% 52 4.0% 1,287 D+91.9
Marion 1,192 92.7% 94 7.3% 1,286 D+85.4
Starr 1,253 98.7% 16 1.3% 1,269 D+97.5
Frio 1,197 95.8% 52 4.2% 1 1,250 D+91.6
Castro 1,191 96.9% 38 3.1% 1,229 D+93.8
Garza 1,203 98.1% 22 1.8% 1 1,226 D+96.3
Moore 1,156 95.4% 54 4.5% 2 1,212 D+90.9
Lipscomb 1,023 85.7% 171 14.3% 1,194 D+71.4
Martin 1,158 97.1% 34 2.8% 1 1,193 D+94.2
Maverick 1,101 95.7% 48 4.2% 1 1,150 D+91.6
Foard 1,100 96.3% 42 3.7% 1,142 D+92.6
Throckmorton 1,118 97.9% 24 2.1% 1,142 D+95.8
Presidio 1,073 96.1% 41 3.7% 2 1,116 D+92.5
Dimmit 1,003 92.8% 78 7.2% 1,081 D+85.6
Coke 1,057 98.3% 15 1.4% 3 1,075 D+96.9
Briscoe 1,045 97.8% 22 2.1% 1 1,068 D+95.8
Motley 1,041 97.7% 24 2.3% 1,065 D+95.5
Zavala 980 94.7% 55 5.3% 1,035 D+89.4
Calhoun 986 97.2% 28 2.8% 1,014 D+94.5
Armstrong 963 98.5% 15 1.5% 978 D+96.9
Jim Hogg 906 96.6% 32 3.4% 938 D+93.2
Brooks 883 96.7% 27 3.0% 3 913 D+93.8
Crane 867 97.2% 25 2.8% 892 D+94.4
Cochran 860 96.8% 28 3.2% 888 D+93.7
San Jacinto 856 96.6% 30 3.4% 886 D+93.2
Hansford 830 94.7% 46 5.3% 876 D+89.5
La Salle 808 98.4% 13 1.6% 821 D+96.8
Kent 790 98.8% 10 1.3% 800 D+97.5
Edwards 710 95.3% 35 4.7% 745 D+90.6
Sutton 642 96.1% 26 3.9% 668 D+92.2
Hartley 626 94.4% 37 5.6% 663 D+88.8
Irion 611 97.6% 11 1.8% 4 626 D+95.8
Reagan 593 97.7% 14 2.3% 607 D+95.4
Somervell 583 96.2% 23 3.8% 606 D+92.4
Kinney 529 89.4% 62 10.5% 1 592 D+78.9
Real 546 93.7% 37 6.3% 583 D+87.3
Crockett 510 94.3% 31 5.7% 541 D+88.5
Terrell 496 91.9% 44 8.1% 540 D+83.7
San Patricio 385 73.8% 136 26.1% 1 522 D+47.7
Oldham 489 98.2% 9 1.8% 498 D+96.4
Hudspeth 478 97.8% 11 2.2% 489 D+95.5
Roberts 458 97.2% 13 2.8% 471 D+94.5
Andrews 458 97.9% 10 2.1% 468 D+95.7
Sterling 438 98.2% 8 1.8% 446 D+96.4
Borden 416 98.3% 7 1.7% 423 D+96.7
Culberson 362 96.0% 15 4.0% 377 D+92.0
Glasscock 318 98.1% 6 1.9% 324 D+96.3
King 284 98.6% 3 1.0% 1 288 D+97.6
Loving 116 98.3% 2 1.7% 118 D+96.6

Counties as they stood in 1940; some have since been split, merged or renamed. Margin: the Democrat's share of all votes minus the Republican's. Sources and how the results were checked.

Texas Senate elections we hold

YearWinnerMargin
2024 Ted Cruz (R) R+8.5
2020 John Cornyn (R) R+9.6
2018 Ted Cruz (R) R+2.6
2014 John Cornyn (R) R+27.2
2012 Ted Cruz (R) R+15.8
2008 John Cornyn (R) R+12.0
2006 Kay Bailey Hutchison (R) R+25.6
2002 John Cornyn (R) R+12.0
2000 Kay Bailey Hutchison (R) R+32.8
1996 Phil Gramm (R) R+10.8
1994 Kay Bailey Hutchison (R) R+22.5
1990 Phil Gramm (R) R+22.8
1988 Lloyd Bentsen (D) D+19.2
1984 Phil Gramm (R) R+17.1
1982 Lloyd Bentsen (D) D+18.1
1978 John G. Tower (R) R+0.5
1976 Lloyd Bentsen (D) D+14.5
1972 John G. Tower (R) R+9.1
1970 Lloyd Bentsen (D) D+7.1
1966 John G. Tower (R) R+13.3
1964 Ralph Yarborough (D) D+12.7
1960 Lyndon B. Johnson (D) D+16.9
1958 Ralph Yarborough (D) D+51.0
1954 Lyndon B. Johnson (D) D+69.9
1952 Price Daniel (D) D+100.0
1948 Lyndon B. Johnson (D) D+33.3
1946 Tom Connally (D) D+77.1
1942 Pappy O'Daniel (D) D+90.5
1940 Tom Connally (D) D+88.5
1936 Morris Sheppard (D) D+85.4
1934 Tom Connally (D) D+93.8
1930 Morris Sheppard (D) D+74.2
1928 Tom Connally (D) D+62.5
1924 Morris Sheppard (D) D+70.8
1922 Earle B. Mayfield (D) D+66.9
1918 Morris Sheppard (D) D+74.3
1916 Charles Culberson (D) D+68.2