United States Presidential election7 Nov 2028in 729 days Senate D 97% House D 58% Calendar Track record Research
PollingForecast.com United States
Closest results
United States · Election results history · 1932 governors · Texas
Election 1932 Results

Each election opens in its own mode: the forecast before the votes are counted, the live count while races are still too close to call, and the results once every race is decided.

1932 Texas governor election

Miriam A. Ferguson (Democrat) beat Orville Bullington (Republican) in Texas in 1932, 61.7% to 37.5%, a margin of 24.2 points and 204,805 votes.

The Democratic hold continued from 1930, when Ross Sterling won.

Democrats led in 211 of the 244 counties as they stood then and Republicans in 32. The largest, Harris, cast 55,364 votes and went to the Democrat by 18.7 points. The closest was Val Verde, where 2 votes separated the two parties.

United States
Results
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 1925 1924 1923 1922 1921 1920 1919 1918 1917 1916 1915 1914 1913 1912 1911 1910 1909 1908 1907 1906 1905 1904 1903 1902 1901 1900 1899 1898 1897 1896 1895 1894 1893 1892 1891 1890 1889 1888 1887 1886 1885 1884 1883 1882 1881 1880 1879 1878 1877 1876 1875 1874 1873 1872 1871 1870 1869 1868 1867 1866 1865
If only voted How this works
If the polls miss like

Early projection, based on early and incomplete polling: the likely matchups, each weighted by the betting markets' odds of both nominations, not a result. Each county is its 2024 presidential margin moved by its state's projected swing; set a national vote and every state, district and county moves by the same amount from our projection. Colours run in 100 steps from a safe Republican to a safe Democratic margin. Boundaries: US Census Bureau.

Governor

CandidatePartyVotesShare
Miriam A. Ferguson won Democratic 522,395 61.7%
Orville Bullington Republican 317,590 37.5%
All other candidates 6,952 0.8%
Total846,937

Every county

CountyDemocratRepublicanOthersTotalMargin
Harris 32,717 59.1% 22,382 40.4% 265 55,364 D+18.7
Dallas 21,132 44.7% 25,836 54.6% 310 47,278 R+9.9
Bexar 30,731 65.7% 15,935 34.1% 126 46,792 D+31.6
Tarrant 16,580 50.3% 16,125 48.9% 238 32,943 D+1.4
Jefferson 12,515 58.2% 8,936 41.5% 68 21,519 D+16.6
El Paso 7,514 53.0% 6,558 46.2% 109 14,181 D+6.7
Hidalgo 7,798 56.3% 5,962 43.0% 96 13,856 D+13.3
McLennan 7,635 55.4% 6,075 44.1% 64 13,774 D+11.3
Travis 8,109 60.7% 5,227 39.1% 23 13,359 D+21.6
Galveston 9,001 73.3% 3,244 26.4% 34 12,279 D+46.9
Grayson 5,856 53.0% 5,154 46.7% 31 11,041 D+6.4
Wichita 4,487 43.6% 5,787 56.3% 14 10,288 R+12.6
Cameron 4,545 51.5% 4,241 48.1% 33 8,819 D+3.4
Bell 5,395 65.2% 2,874 34.7% 10 8,279 D+30.5
Comanche 2,058 24.9% 6,203 75.0% 11 8,272 R+50.1
Smith 5,053 63.2% 2,917 36.5% 19 7,989 D+26.7
Potter 3,413 45.1% 4,142 54.7% 13 7,568 R+9.6
Nueces 4,471 59.4% 3,045 40.4% 17 7,533 D+18.9
Ellis 4,708 63.9% 2,634 35.7% 31 7,373 D+28.1
Collin 5,040 72.2% 1,910 27.4% 30 6,980 D+44.8
Navarro 4,273 61.9% 2,624 38.0% 5 6,902 D+23.9
Lamar 4,166 68.0% 1,933 31.6% 23 6,122 D+36.5
Lubbock 3,171 53.5% 2,744 46.3% 17 5,932 D+7.2
Tom Green 2,652 46.1% 3,091 53.7% 9 5,752 R+7.6
Taylor 2,946 51.3% 2,790 48.6% 9 5,745 D+2.7
Denton 3,358 59.1% 2,307 40.6% 21 5,686 D+18.5
Fannin 3,872 68.3% 1,791 31.6% 8 5,671 D+36.7
Gregg 4,101 73.5% 1,467 26.3% 10 5,578 D+47.2
Hill 3,632 65.8% 1,878 34.0% 7 5,517 D+31.8
Eastland 3,209 58.2% 2,272 41.2% 29 5,510 D+17.0
Rusk 4,047 75.4% 1,314 24.5% 5 5,366 D+50.9
Johnson 2,962 56.0% 2,312 43.7% 18 5,292 D+12.3
Fayette 4,383 83.3% 878 16.7% 3 5,264 D+66.6
Angelina 3,590 71.7% 1,416 28.3% 4 5,010 D+43.4
Milam 3,705 75.3% 1,207 24.5% 7 4,919 D+50.8
Webb 3,697 75.3% 1,209 24.6% 4 4,910 D+50.7
Lavaca 4,041 82.4% 860 17.5% 6 4,907 D+64.8
Anderson 3,664 75.7% 1,165 24.1% 12 4,841 D+51.6
Bowie 2,827 62.1% 1,709 37.6% 15 4,551 D+24.6
Limestone 3,179 70.4% 1,324 29.3% 11 4,514 D+41.1
Harrison 2,148 47.7% 2,344 52.0% 14 4,506 R+4.3
Guadalupe 2,995 67.3% 1,445 32.5% 8 4,448 D+34.8
Cherokee 2,863 66.7% 1,424 33.2% 7 4,294 D+33.5
Van Zandt 3,396 79.2% 869 20.3% 25 4,290 D+58.9
Kaufman 2,940 68.9% 1,324 31.0% 3 4,267 D+37.9
Cooke 2,336 55.1% 1,894 44.7% 11 4,241 D+10.4
Brown 2,698 64.0% 1,504 35.7% 13 4,215 D+28.3
Falls 3,218 77.2% 939 22.5% 12 4,169 D+54.7
Hopkins 2,700 67.2% 1,311 32.7% 4 4,015 D+34.6
Gray 2,130 54.5% 1,762 45.1% 18 3,910 D+9.4
Henderson 2,999 77.7% 856 22.2% 6 3,861 D+55.5
Wharton 2,284 61.0% 1,444 38.6% 15 3,743 D+22.4
Gonzales 2,381 64.4% 1,312 35.5% 5 3,698 D+28.9
Shelby 3,097 84.2% 563 15.3% 18 3,678 D+68.9
Nacogdoches 2,811 76.5% 859 23.4% 4 3,674 D+53.1
Brazoria 2,309 62.9% 1,359 37.0% 3 3,671 D+25.9
Caldwell 2,387 67.0% 1,176 33.0% 3,563 D+34.0
Coryell 2,523 71.2% 1,016 28.7% 3 3,542 D+42.5
De Witt 2,346 66.8% 1,161 33.1% 4 3,511 D+33.8
Wilbarger 2,213 63.2% 1,272 36.3% 17 3,502 D+26.9
Washington 3,085 88.2% 412 11.8% 2 3,499 D+76.4
Wood 2,724 78.4% 737 21.2% 15 3,476 D+57.2
Hale 1,608 46.5% 1,832 53.0% 16 3,456 R+6.5
Young 1,984 57.4% 1,467 42.5% 4 3,455 D+15.0
Bosque 2,518 73.6% 902 26.4% 3,420 D+47.3
Parker 1,850 54.2% 1,539 45.1% 24 3,413 D+9.1
Gillespie 2,038 60.8% 1,303 38.9% 9 3,350 D+21.9
Montague 2,090 62.8% 1,219 36.6% 20 3,329 D+26.2
Fort Bend 2,491 76.7% 750 23.1% 5 3,246 D+53.6
Red River 2,358 72.8% 874 27.0% 7 3,239 D+45.8
Bastrop 2,470 76.5% 758 23.5% 1 3,229 D+53.0
Cass 2,557 79.5% 658 20.5% 3,215 D+59.1
Houston 2,166 67.7% 1,029 32.2% 3 3,198 D+35.6
Runnels 2,039 63.9% 1,137 35.6% 15 3,191 D+28.3
Lamb 2,049 64.3% 1,128 35.4% 11 3,188 D+28.9
Jones 1,968 63.5% 1,108 35.7% 24 3,100 D+27.7
Colorado 2,150 69.8% 922 29.9% 9 3,081 D+39.9
Coleman 1,949 63.4% 1,119 36.4% 8 3,076 D+27.0
Austin 2,529 82.5% 536 17.5% 1 3,066 D+65.0
Medina 2,118 69.2% 938 30.7% 4 3,060 D+38.6
Orange 2,410 78.8% 647 21.2% 2 3,059 D+57.6
Palo Pinto 1,753 57.8% 1,274 42.0% 5 3,032 D+15.8
Upshur 2,346 77.5% 667 22.0% 14 3,027 D+55.5
Stephens 1,710 57.2% 1,270 42.5% 10 2,990 D+14.7
Victoria 2,192 74.4% 748 25.4% 7 2,947 D+49.0
Wise 1,713 58.5% 1,201 41.0% 13 2,927 D+17.5
Howard 1,748 61.0% 1,112 38.8% 4 2,864 D+22.2
Kerr 1,412 49.5% 1,425 49.9% 18 2,855 R+0.5
Liberty 1,935 70.1% 818 29.6% 7 2,760 D+40.5
Hardin 2,370 87.5% 340 12.5% 2,710 D+74.9
Brazos 1,656 61.4% 1,036 38.4% 6 2,698 D+23.0
Bee 1,514 56.1% 1,170 43.4% 13 2,697 D+12.8
Burleson 2,331 86.6% 313 11.6% 49 2,693 D+74.9
Karnes 1,958 73.4% 706 26.5% 2 2,666 D+47.0
Panola 2,108 80.5% 500 19.1% 10 2,618 D+61.4
San Patricio 1,290 49.3% 1,311 50.1% 16 2,617 R+0.8
Nolan 1,550 59.4% 1,055 40.4% 5 2,610 D+19.0
Wilson 2,018 77.5% 585 22.5% 2 2,605 D+55.0
Titus 2,523 97.0% 75 2.9% 4 2,602 D+94.1
Freestone 1,692 65.1% 901 34.7% 5 2,598 D+30.4
Hutchinson 1,341 52.7% 1,181 46.4% 22 2,544 D+6.3
Haskell 1,666 66.6% 831 33.2% 6 2,503 D+33.4
Clay 1,568 63.5% 895 36.2% 7 2,470 D+27.2
Matagorda 1,319 54.4% 1,095 45.1% 12 2,426 D+9.2
Wheeler 1,514 62.6% 894 37.0% 10 2,418 D+25.6
Comal 1,795 76.9% 534 22.9% 4 2,333 D+54.1
Dallam 895 38.5% 1,418 60.9% 14 2,327 R+22.5
Atascosa 1,637 71.6% 641 28.0% 8 2,286 D+43.6
McCulloch 1,395 61.1% 889 38.9% 1 2,285 D+22.1
Callahan 1,635 73.2% 593 26.5% 7 2,235 D+46.6
Childress 1,307 59.2% 886 40.1% 14 2,207 D+19.1
Grimes 1,312 59.6% 888 40.3% 3 2,203 D+19.2
Hays 1,207 55.6% 963 44.4% 1 2,171 D+11.2
Uvalde 1,310 60.7% 848 39.3% 2,158 D+21.4
Hall 1,141 53.0% 993 46.1% 19 2,153 D+6.9
Montgomery 1,655 77.7% 474 22.3% 1 2,130 D+55.4
Polk 1,581 74.3% 545 25.6% 1 2,127 D+48.7
Floyd 1,125 53.2% 987 46.6% 4 2,116 D+6.5
Leon 1,512 71.5% 600 28.4% 2 2,114 D+43.1
Lynn 1,325 63.8% 745 35.9% 8 2,078 D+27.9
Jasper 1,489 71.9% 579 27.9% 4 2,072 D+43.9
Hardeman 1,310 63.4% 755 36.5% 1 2,066 D+26.9
Lee 1,571 76.7% 477 23.3% 2,048 D+53.4
Burnet 1,280 63.0% 748 36.8% 4 2,032 D+26.2
Delta 1,541 76.9% 461 23.0% 3 2,005 D+53.9
Lampasas 1,097 55.3% 885 44.7% 1,982 D+10.7
Kleberg 1,201 62.9% 698 36.5% 11 1,910 D+26.3
Walker 1,391 73.2% 508 26.7% 2 1,901 D+46.4
Collingsworth 1,167 63.0% 669 36.1% 15 1,851 D+26.9
Sabine 1,617 87.8% 221 12.0% 4 1,842 D+75.8
Val Verde 916 50.0% 914 49.9% 3 1,833 D+0.1
San Augustine 1,672 91.7% 151 8.3% 1 1,824 D+83.4
Dawson 1,119 61.5% 699 38.4% 1 1,819 D+23.1
Donley 891 49.3% 912 50.5% 3 1,806 R+1.2
Mitchell 1,019 57.5% 752 42.5% 1,771 D+15.1
Goliad 1,227 70.0% 520 29.7% 6 1,753 D+40.3
Randall 779 45.2% 941 54.6% 4 1,724 R+9.4
Archer 1,054 62.4% 635 37.6% 1 1,690 D+24.8
Scurry 954 57.0% 715 42.7% 4 1,673 D+14.3
Crosby 1,029 61.8% 637 38.2% 1,666 D+23.5
Knox 1,106 66.8% 543 32.8% 6 1,655 D+34.0
Swisher 820 49.5% 820 49.5% 15 1,655 level
Jack 882 53.5% 760 46.1% 8 1,650 D+7.4
Newton 1,403 86.1% 225 13.8% 2 1,630 D+72.3
Kendall 845 51.9% 778 47.8% 5 1,628 D+4.1
Jim Wells 1,096 67.7% 519 32.1% 4 1,619 D+35.6
Hockley 1,175 72.6% 412 25.5% 31 1,618 D+47.2
Trinity 1,230 76.9% 369 23.1% 1,599 D+53.8
Duval 1,495 93.9% 97 6.1% 1,592 D+87.8
Deaf Smith 547 34.5% 1,038 65.5% 1,585 R+31.0
Mills 1,038 66.4% 525 33.6% 1,563 D+32.8
Pecos 902 58.4% 638 41.3% 4 1,544 D+17.1
Terry 1,014 65.7% 501 32.4% 29 1,544 D+33.2
Dickens 1,103 72.0% 421 27.5% 7 1,531 D+44.5
Fisher 1,028 67.7% 489 32.2% 2 1,519 D+35.5
Jackson 838 55.9% 658 43.9% 4 1,500 D+12.0
Tyler 1,079 73.9% 380 26.0% 1 1,460 D+47.9
Baylor 931 65.0% 497 34.7% 4 1,432 D+30.3
Midland 640 45.2% 763 53.8% 14 1,417 R+8.7
Llano 938 66.4% 473 33.5% 2 1,413 D+32.9
Shackelford 833 59.2% 569 40.4% 6 1,408 D+18.8
Camp 1,013 72.0% 392 27.9% 1 1,406 D+44.2
Refugio 907 65.0% 474 34.0% 15 1,396 D+31.0
Blanco 995 71.4% 390 28.0% 8 1,393 D+43.4
Willacy 837 63.0% 489 36.8% 2 1,328 D+26.2
Madison 958 72.7% 350 26.6% 9 1,317 D+46.2
Franklin 1,035 78.6% 279 21.2% 2 1,316 D+57.4
Parmer 766 58.3% 540 41.1% 8 1,314 D+17.2
Rockwall 956 72.8% 356 27.1% 1 1,313 D+45.7
Bandera 658 50.6% 637 49.0% 5 1,300 D+1.6
Ochiltree 486 37.6% 804 62.1% 4 1,294 R+24.6
Waller 958 75.1% 316 24.8% 1 1,275 D+50.4
Live Oak 899 70.6% 369 29.0% 6 1,274 D+41.6
Lipscomb 342 27.9% 877 71.5% 7 1,226 R+43.6
Hood 784 64.1% 435 35.5% 5 1,224 D+28.5
Cottle 844 70.2% 356 29.6% 2 1,202 D+40.6
Frio 705 58.8% 494 41.2% 1,199 D+17.6
Reeves 586 48.9% 613 51.1% 1,199 R+2.3
Mason 581 49.2% 596 50.5% 3 1,180 R+1.3
Concho 841 71.4% 333 28.3% 4 1,178 D+43.1
Upton 658 57.6% 478 41.8% 7 1,143 D+15.7
Dimmit 509 47.0% 574 53.0% 1,083 R+6.0
Hemphill 355 33.6% 699 66.1% 3 1,057 R+32.5
Maverick 634 60.4% 411 39.1% 5 1,050 D+21.2
Kimble 591 56.7% 449 43.1% 2 1,042 D+13.6
Coke 666 64.2% 364 35.1% 7 1,037 D+29.1
Menard 597 58.0% 431 41.9% 1 1,029 D+16.1
Stonewall 808 79.0% 213 20.8% 2 1,023 D+58.2
Castro 638 62.7% 377 37.0% 3 1,018 D+25.6
Briscoe 675 67.8% 318 31.9% 3 996 D+35.8
Zavala 538 54.1% 455 45.7% 2 995 D+8.3
Brewster 526 53.5% 457 46.4% 1 984 D+7.0
Rains 882 89.8% 96 9.8% 4 982 D+80.0
Throckmorton 550 56.3% 423 43.3% 4 977 D+13.0
Bailey 615 63.9% 345 35.9% 2 962 D+28.1
Chambers 638 66.7% 315 32.9% 4 957 D+33.8
Presidio 624 65.2% 332 34.7% 1 957 D+30.5
Foard 577 61.5% 344 36.7% 17 938 D+24.8
Marion 714 77.4% 205 22.2% 4 923 D+55.1
Calhoun 586 63.6% 335 36.4% 921 D+27.3
Motley 524 57.6% 384 42.2% 1 909 D+15.4
Garza 510 56.9% 383 42.7% 4 897 D+14.2
La Salle 680 76.0% 214 23.9% 1 895 D+52.1
Hansford 500 56.4% 369 41.6% 17 886 D+14.8
San Jacinto 699 84.1% 132 15.9% 831 D+68.2
Reagan 316 39.0% 494 60.9% 1 811 R+21.9
Edwards 406 50.6% 395 49.2% 2 803 D+1.4
Armstrong 366 45.9% 430 53.9% 2 798 R+8.0
Kinney 562 71.1% 227 28.7% 1 790 D+42.4
Starr 712 91.4% 67 8.6% 779 D+82.8
Martin 541 71.8% 203 26.9% 10 754 D+44.8
Ward 515 68.3% 236 31.3% 3 754 D+37.0
Winkler 473 63.1% 271 36.1% 6 750 D+26.9
Brooks 514 72.2% 196 27.5% 2 712 D+44.7
Hartley 329 49.5% 335 50.5% 664 R+0.9
Somervell 417 67.5% 195 31.6% 6 618 D+35.9
Moore 213 34.6% 401 65.2% 1 615 R+30.6
Terrell 318 51.7% 295 48.0% 2 615 D+3.7
Sherman 244 40.3% 358 59.2% 3 605 R+18.8
Kent 451 77.1% 131 22.4% 3 585 D+54.7
Ector 267 45.7% 297 50.9% 20 584 R+5.1
Schleicher 314 54.0% 268 46.0% 582 D+7.9
Gaines 293 51.4% 270 47.4% 7 570 D+4.0
Sutton 221 43.6% 286 56.4% 507 R+12.8
Roberts 177 35.4% 323 64.6% 500 R+29.2
Crockett 147 29.6% 348 70.0% 2 497 R+40.4
Oldham 230 47.4% 255 52.6% 485 R+5.2
Real 291 61.5% 181 38.3% 1 473 D+23.3
Jim Hogg 302 64.0% 170 36.0% 472 D+28.0
Irion 239 52.1% 213 46.4% 7 459 D+5.7
Crane 257 56.4% 199 43.6% 456 D+12.7
Cochran 247 60.5% 154 37.7% 7 408 D+22.8
Hudspeth 198 52.7% 178 47.3% 376 D+5.3
Sterling 163 46.4% 188 53.6% 351 R+7.1
Aransas 174 54.0% 145 45.0% 3 322 D+9.0
Culberson 193 62.5% 115 37.2% 1 309 D+25.2
Zapata 265 88.3% 35 11.7% 300 D+76.7
Jeff Davis 115 38.5% 182 60.9% 2 299 R+22.4
McMullen 215 81.7% 48 18.3% 263 D+63.5
Borden 200 83.3% 40 16.7% 240 D+66.7
King 190 83.3% 38 16.7% 228 D+66.7
Loving 142 69.6% 61 29.9% 1 204 D+39.7
Andrews 132 68.0% 60 30.9% 2 194 D+37.1
Kenedy 117 90.7% 12 9.3% 129 D+81.4

Counties as they stood in 1932; some have since been split, merged or renamed. Margin: the Democrat's share of all votes minus the Republican's. Sources and how the results were checked.

Texas governor elections we hold

YearWinnerMargin
2022 Greg Abbott (R) R+10.9
2018 Abbott (R) R+13.3
2014 Greg Abbott (R) R+20.4
2010 Rick Perry (R) R+12.7
2006 Rick Perry (R) R+9.2
2002 Rick Perry (R) R+17.8
1998 George W. Bush (R) R+37.1
1994 George W. Bush (R) R+7.6
1990 Ann Richards (D) D+2.6
1986 William P. Clements (R) R+6.7
1982 Mark White (D) D+7.3
1978 William P. Clements (R) R+0.7
1974 Dolph Briscoe (D) D+30.3
1972 Dolph Briscoe (D) D+2.9
1970 Preston Smith (D) D+6.9
1968 Preston Smith (D) D+14.0
1966 John B. Connally (D) D+47.0
1964 John B. Connally (D) D+47.8
1962 John B. Connally (D) D+8.4
1960 Price Daniel (D) D+45.5
1958 Price Daniel (D) D+76.2
1956 Price Daniel (D) D+63.2
1954 Allan Shivers (D) D+79.0
1952 Allan Shivers (D) D+98.1
1950 Allan Shivers (D) D+79.9
1948 Beauford H. Jester (D) D+70.0
1946 Beauford H. Jester (D) D+82.5
1944 Coke R. Stevenson (D) D+81.7
1942 Coke R. Stevenson (D) D+93.7
1940 W. Lee O'Daniel (D) D+88.9
1938 W. Lee O'Daniel (D) D+93.8
1936 James V. Allred (D) D+85.9
1934 James V. Allred (D) D+93.4
1932 Miriam A. Ferguson (D) D+24.2
1930 Ross Sterling (D) D+60.4
1928 Dan Moody (D) D+65.0
1926 Dan Moody (D) D+73.8
1924 Miriam A. Ferguson (D) D+17.8
1922 Pat M. Neff (D) D+63.8
1920 Pat Morris Neff (D) D+41.2
1918 William P. Hobby (D) D+68.9
1916 James E. Ferguson (D) D+68.1
1914 James E. Ferguson (D) D+76.7
1912 Oscar Branch Colquitt (D) D+70.5
1910 Oscar Branch Colquitt (D) D+67.8
1908 Thomas Mitchell Campbell (D) D+48.4
1906 Thomas M. Campbell (D) D+68.1
1904 S. W. T. Lanham (D) D+53.3
1902 Samuel W.T. Lanham (D) D+56.5
1900 Joseph D. Sayers (D) D+42.4
1898 Joseph D. Sayers (D) D+71.2
1896 Charles A. Culberson (D) D+55.4
1894 Charles A. Culberson (D) D+36.1
1892 James S. Hogg (D) D+43.4
1890 James S. Hogg (D) D+53.8
1888 Lawrence S. Ross (D) D+71.8
1886 Lawrence S. Ross (D) D+52.2
1884 John Ireland (D) D+57.2
1882 John Ireland (D) D+59.5
1880 Oran M. Roberts (D) D+38.5
1878 Oran M. Roberts (D) D+56.8
1876 Richard Coke (D) D+50.0
1873 Richard Coke (D) D+31.6
1869 Edmund J. Davis (R) R+50.2
1866 James W. Throckmorton (D) D+60.3