United States Presidential election7 Nov 2028in 728 days Senate D 97% House D 58% Calendar Track record Research
PollingForecast.com United States
Closest results
United States · Election results history · 1902 governors · Texas
Election 1902 Results

Each election opens in its own mode: the forecast before the votes are counted, the live count while races are still too close to call, and the results once every race is decided.

1902 Texas governor election

Samuel W.T. Lanham (Democrat) beat George W. Burkett (Republican) in Texas in 1902, 74.9% to 18.5%, a margin of 56.5 points and 202,783 votes.

The Democratic hold continued from 1900, when Joseph D. Sayers won.

Democrats led in 215 of the 224 counties as they stood then and Republicans in 9. The largest, Bexar, cast 8,001 votes and went to the Democrat by 42.1 points. The closest was Jeff Davis, where 16 votes separated the two parties.

United States
Results
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 1925 1924 1923 1922 1921 1920 1919 1918 1917 1916 1915 1914 1913 1912 1911 1910 1909 1908 1907 1906 1905 1904 1903 1902 1901 1900 1899 1898 1897 1896 1895 1894 1893 1892 1891 1890 1889 1888 1887 1886 1885 1884 1883 1882 1881 1880 1879 1878 1877 1876 1875 1874 1873 1872 1871 1870 1869 1868 1867 1866 1865
If only voted How this works
If the polls miss like

Early projection, based on early and incomplete polling: the likely matchups, each weighted by the betting markets' odds of both nominations, not a result. Each county is its 2024 presidential margin moved by its state's projected swing; set a national vote and every state, district and county moves by the same amount from our projection. Colours run in 100 steps from a safe Republican to a safe Democratic margin. Boundaries: US Census Bureau.

Governor

CandidatePartyVotesShare
Samuel W.T. Lanham won Democratic 269,076 74.9%
George W. Burkett Republican 66,293 18.5%
All other candidates 23,769 6.6%
Total359,138

Every county

CountyDemocratRepublicanOthersTotalMargin
Bexar 5,455 68.2% 2,090 26.1% 456 8,001 D+42.1
Harris 5,193 70.0% 1,868 25.2% 355 7,416 D+44.8
Dallas 5,355 80.5% 744 11.2% 555 6,654 D+69.3
Tarrant 5,102 78.0% 989 15.1% 452 6,543 D+62.9
Fannin 4,928 79.2% 1,180 19.0% 116 6,224 D+60.2
Galveston 4,324 74.0% 1,355 23.2% 162 5,841 D+50.8
Fayette 3,551 64.3% 1,873 33.9% 99 5,523 D+30.4
Grayson 4,358 80.0% 871 16.0% 218 5,447 D+64.0
Ellis 4,832 88.9% 429 7.9% 173 5,434 D+81.0
Travis 3,819 72.0% 1,379 26.0% 105 5,303 D+46.0
McLennan 4,138 88.1% 393 8.4% 166 4,697 D+79.7
Navarro 3,619 80.9% 489 10.9% 366 4,474 D+70.0
Gonzales 2,704 62.6% 1,239 28.7% 374 4,317 D+33.9
Bell 3,984 92.7% 173 4.0% 140 4,297 D+88.7
Kaufman 3,666 85.4% 496 11.6% 130 4,292 D+73.9
Hunt 3,669 86.9% 334 7.9% 217 4,220 D+79.0
Comanche 2,017 50.3% 292 7.3% 1,702 4,011 D+43.0
Bowie 3,058 76.3% 867 21.6% 81 4,006 D+54.7
Williamson 3,217 80.4% 548 13.7% 235 4,000 D+66.7
Hill 3,541 89.1% 332 8.4% 99 3,972 D+80.8
Collin 3,386 88.9% 356 9.4% 65 3,807 D+79.6
Lamar 3,251 88.2% 333 9.0% 103 3,687 D+79.1
Washington 2,973 81.8% 658 18.1% 2 3,633 D+63.7
Milam 2,834 79.3% 479 13.4% 262 3,575 D+65.9
Lavaca 2,377 66.8% 802 22.5% 381 3,560 D+44.2
Guadalupe 1,722 48.5% 1,789 50.4% 38 3,549 R+1.9
Erath 2,560 73.9% 188 5.4% 716 3,464 D+68.5
Red River 2,492 73.1% 831 24.4% 86 3,409 D+48.7
Nacogdoches 1,813 53.2% 761 22.3% 834 3,408 D+30.9
Bastrop 2,101 61.9% 1,206 35.5% 87 3,394 D+26.4
Robertson 3,173 94.8% 163 4.9% 11 3,347 D+89.9
Parker 2,342 71.2% 223 6.8% 723 3,288 D+64.4
Van Zandt 2,687 81.8% 84 2.6% 512 3,283 D+79.3
Smith 2,154 66.3% 904 27.8% 191 3,249 D+38.5
Jefferson 2,041 64.6% 523 16.6% 593 3,157 D+48.1
Falls 2,608 84.4% 392 12.7% 90 3,090 D+71.7
Webb 2,212 71.8% 869 28.2% 1 3,082 D+43.6
Harrison 2,834 92.6% 181 5.9% 45 3,060 D+86.7
Eastland 2,275 74.8% 243 8.0% 523 3,041 D+66.8
Wilson 2,273 76.3% 601 20.2% 104 2,978 D+56.1
Wise 2,492 84.1% 189 6.4% 282 2,963 D+77.7
Austin 1,859 64.1% 1,022 35.2% 20 2,901 D+28.9
El Paso 2,702 95.1% 138 4.9% 2,840 D+90.3
Anderson 1,944 69.3% 845 30.1% 17 2,806 D+39.2
Rusk 1,760 63.9% 920 33.4% 74 2,754 D+30.5
Cameron 1,715 62.8% 1,013 37.1% 2 2,730 D+25.7
Johnson 2,144 79.5% 30 1.1% 523 2,697 D+78.4
Brazos 1,922 72.0% 730 27.3% 18 2,670 D+44.6
Limestone 2,357 88.9% 252 9.5% 41 2,650 D+79.4
Denton 2,196 83.0% 392 14.8% 58 2,646 D+68.2
De Witt 1,422 54.5% 1,079 41.4% 108 2,609 D+13.1
Montgomery 1,367 56.0% 1,036 42.4% 38 2,441 D+13.6
Henderson 1,793 73.5% 366 15.0% 279 2,438 D+58.5
Victoria 1,243 52.0% 1,144 47.8% 4 2,391 D+4.1
Cherokee 1,759 74.0% 466 19.6% 153 2,378 D+54.4
Caldwell 1,844 78.6% 293 12.5% 210 2,347 D+66.1
Lee 1,326 56.8% 944 40.4% 65 2,335 D+16.4
Delta 1,637 71.9% 121 5.3% 520 2,278 D+66.5
Houston 1,799 79.0% 471 20.7% 7 2,277 D+58.3
Wood 1,803 79.9% 288 12.8% 165 2,256 D+67.2
Cooke 2,071 92.9% 113 5.1% 45 2,229 D+87.8
Coryell 1,903 85.5% 145 6.5% 177 2,225 D+79.0
Burleson 1,856 83.7% 297 13.4% 65 2,218 D+70.3
Freestone 1,468 66.5% 636 28.8% 105 2,209 D+37.7
Hamilton 1,475 67.1% 156 7.1% 568 2,199 D+60.0
Montague 1,965 91.8% 99 4.6% 77 2,141 D+87.2
Colorado 1,263 62.8% 539 26.8% 208 2,010 D+36.0
Hays 1,507 78.7% 336 17.5% 73 1,916 D+61.1
Cass 1,449 76.8% 316 16.8% 121 1,886 D+60.1
Nueces 1,225 66.5% 593 32.2% 23 1,841 D+34.3
Bosque 1,577 86.4% 170 9.3% 79 1,826 D+77.1
Leon 1,117 61.8% 588 32.6% 101 1,806 D+29.3
Burnet 1,661 92.7% 54 3.0% 76 1,791 D+89.7
Palo Pinto 1,528 85.8% 32 1.8% 221 1,781 D+84.0
Starr 1,190 66.9% 589 33.1% 1,779 D+33.8
Brown 1,450 84.0% 191 11.1% 86 1,727 D+72.9
San Jacinto 714 41.5% 1,005 58.4% 3 1,722 R+16.9
Goliad 759 44.6% 894 52.6% 47 1,700 R+7.9
Madison 1,052 64.3% 333 20.4% 251 1,636 D+43.9
Jack 912 56.1% 151 9.3% 563 1,626 D+46.8
Karnes 1,122 69.1% 335 20.6% 166 1,623 D+48.5
Waller 739 45.7% 776 48.0% 102 1,617 R+2.3
Angelina 1,255 79.7% 306 19.4% 14 1,575 D+60.3
Gillespie 598 39.0% 924 60.3% 10 1,532 R+21.3
Gregg 906 62.3% 520 35.8% 28 1,454 D+26.5
Walker 1,065 73.7% 336 23.2% 45 1,446 D+50.4
Trinity 1,128 79.1% 295 20.7% 3 1,426 D+58.4
Lampasas 869 61.1% 168 11.8% 385 1,422 D+49.3
Medina 739 52.6% 634 45.2% 31 1,404 D+7.5
Liberty 780 57.5% 532 39.2% 44 1,356 D+18.3
Orange 846 62.5% 405 29.9% 103 1,354 D+32.6
Comal 849 63.9% 477 35.9% 2 1,328 D+28.0
Shelby 1,170 88.3% 131 9.9% 24 1,325 D+78.4
San Augustine 1,026 79.0% 179 13.8% 94 1,299 D+65.2
Clay 1,074 85.0% 190 15.0% 1,264 D+69.9
San Saba 1,070 84.8% 108 8.6% 84 1,262 D+76.2
Morris 1,004 79.7% 213 16.9% 42 1,259 D+62.8
Titus 934 74.8% 171 13.7% 143 1,248 D+61.1
Camp 873 70.4% 335 27.0% 32 1,240 D+43.4
Upshur 1,062 86.5% 145 11.8% 21 1,228 D+74.7
Tyler 876 72.3% 274 22.6% 61 1,211 D+49.7
Atascosa 1,022 85.1% 90 7.5% 89 1,201 D+77.6
Duval 727 61.1% 462 38.9% 1,189 D+22.3
Llano 990 83.4% 62 5.2% 135 1,187 D+78.2
Jones 942 81.4% 67 5.8% 148 1,157 D+75.6
Rains 676 58.6% 231 20.0% 247 1,154 D+38.6
Taylor 1,005 87.8% 48 4.2% 91 1,144 D+83.7
Newton 684 60.0% 357 31.3% 99 1,140 D+28.7
Grimes 1,067 93.7% 44 3.9% 28 1,139 D+89.8
Wharton 463 40.8% 619 54.6% 52 1,134 R+13.8
Young 970 87.3% 61 5.5% 80 1,111 D+81.8
Bee 866 78.6% 216 19.6% 20 1,102 D+59.0
Jackson 534 50.3% 483 45.5% 44 1,061 D+4.8
Brazoria 824 77.9% 154 14.6% 80 1,058 D+63.3
Mason 667 64.9% 257 25.0% 103 1,027 D+39.9
Polk 744 72.7% 232 22.7% 48 1,024 D+50.0
Hidalgo 950 93.1% 70 6.9% 1,020 D+86.3
Hood 705 69.2% 314 30.8% 1,019 D+38.4
Coleman 948 93.8% 30 3.0% 33 1,011 D+90.8
Wilbarger 822 81.4% 78 7.7% 110 1,010 D+73.7
Wichita 781 78.3% 149 14.9% 67 997 D+63.4
Callahan 771 79.4% 99 10.2% 101 971 D+69.2
Mills 647 67.4% 31 3.2% 282 960 D+64.2
Hardin 596 62.1% 319 33.3% 44 959 D+28.9
Scurry 484 50.7% 71 7.4% 400 955 D+43.2
Val Verde 770 83.1% 40 4.3% 117 927 D+78.7
Blanco 656 71.5% 143 15.6% 119 918 D+55.9
Bandera 696 76.6% 183 20.1% 30 909 D+56.4
Kerr 652 71.9% 245 27.0% 10 907 D+44.9
Uvalde 657 73.0% 235 26.1% 8 900 D+46.9
Fort Bend 728 81.4% 132 14.8% 34 894 D+66.7
Tom Green 725 81.4% 155 17.4% 11 891 D+64.0
McCulloch 762 86.2% 95 10.7% 27 884 D+75.5
Franklin 859 99.2% 7 0.8% 866 D+98.4
Haskell 752 88.3% 72 8.5% 28 852 D+79.8
Rockwall 757 89.9% 32 3.8% 53 842 D+86.1
Runnels 677 84.8% 48 6.0% 73 798 D+78.8
Kendall 322 41.1% 458 58.5% 3 783 R+17.4
Fisher 484 63.9% 74 9.8% 199 757 D+54.2
Frio 529 70.0% 209 27.6% 18 756 D+42.3
Coke 477 64.4% 71 9.6% 193 741 D+54.8
Nolan 600 81.5% 88 12.0% 48 736 D+69.6
Maverick 436 59.7% 285 39.0% 9 730 D+20.7
Knox 597 84.6% 41 5.8% 68 706 D+78.8
Hardeman 626 90.6% 27 3.9% 38 691 D+86.7
Howard 558 83.0% 69 10.3% 45 672 D+72.8
Somervell 402 61.8% 1 0.2% 248 651 D+61.6
Mitchell 501 79.9% 66 10.5% 60 627 D+69.4
Stephens 540 89.9% 11 1.8% 50 601 D+88.0
Baylor 515 85.8% 38 6.3% 47 600 D+79.5
Childress 542 90.5% 10 1.7% 47 599 D+88.8
Potter 475 79.3% 59 9.8% 65 599 D+69.4
Edwards 371 64.7% 1 0.2% 201 573 D+64.6
Presidio 453 79.3% 118 20.7% 571 D+58.7
Jasper 381 66.8% 141 24.7% 48 570 D+42.1
San Patricio 477 83.8% 56 9.8% 36 569 D+74.0
Matagorda 515 97.5% 1 0.2% 12 528 D+97.3
Kimble 479 95.4% 22 4.4% 1 502 D+91.0
Archer 418 83.8% 75 15.0% 6 499 D+68.7
Donley 357 72.6% 35 7.1% 100 492 D+65.4
Chambers 303 63.4% 172 36.0% 3 478 D+27.4
Hale 350 74.2% 3 0.6% 119 472 D+73.5
Live Oak 404 86.0% 47 10.0% 19 470 D+76.0
Pecos 348 75.3% 92 19.9% 22 462 D+55.4
La Salle 404 89.0% 50 11.0% 454 D+78.0
Floyd 355 78.4% 34 7.5% 64 453 D+70.9
Marion 315 70.5% 114 25.5% 18 447 D+45.0
Zapata 159 36.3% 279 63.7% 438 R+27.4
Kinney 278 63.6% 155 35.5% 4 437 D+28.1
Menard 419 95.9% 8 1.8% 10 437 D+94.1
Stonewall 410 94.3% 13 3.0% 12 435 D+91.3
Foard 300 71.3% 31 7.4% 90 421 D+63.9
Hall 356 85.8% 28 6.7% 31 415 D+79.0
Midland 347 87.8% 37 9.4% 11 395 D+78.5
Aransas 274 70.6% 109 28.1% 5 388 D+42.5
Brewster 285 73.6% 102 26.4% 387 D+47.3
Deaf Smith 356 93.4% 8 2.1% 17 381 D+91.3
Crockett 251 69.0% 72 19.8% 41 364 D+49.2
Concho 274 77.2% 38 10.7% 43 355 D+66.5
Refugio 219 61.7% 135 38.0% 1 355 D+23.7
Ward 313 88.9% 15 4.3% 24 352 D+84.7
Lubbock 298 87.1% 13 3.8% 31 342 D+83.3
Motley 259 76.4% 9 2.7% 71 339 D+73.7
Randall 276 82.9% 19 5.7% 38 333 D+77.2
Reeves 314 98.7% 4 1.3% 318 D+97.5
Sutton 214 69.3% 94 30.4% 1 309 D+38.8
Throckmorton 220 72.8% 28 9.3% 54 302 D+63.6
Jeff Davis 139 47.3% 155 52.7% 294 R+5.4
Dimmit 217 74.3% 63 21.6% 12 292 D+52.7
Collingsworth 269 94.4% 7 2.5% 9 285 D+91.9
Swisher 222 80.7% 30 10.9% 23 275 D+69.8
Calhoun 174 63.5% 94 34.3% 6 274 D+29.2
Armstrong 260 95.2% 6 2.2% 7 273 D+93.0
Briscoe 261 95.6% 6 2.2% 6 273 D+93.4
Borden 246 90.4% 26 9.6% 272 D+80.9
Sterling 173 69.5% 33 13.3% 43 249 D+56.2
Dallam 222 90.6% 20 8.2% 3 245 D+82.4
Dickens 219 90.1% 24 9.9% 243 D+80.2
Schleicher 187 81.3% 21 9.1% 22 230 D+72.2
Hartley 225 98.7% 3 1.3% 228 D+97.4
Kent 192 85.0% 13 5.8% 21 226 D+79.2
Shackelford 204 92.3% 8 3.6% 9 221 D+88.7
Hemphill 168 77.1% 29 13.3% 21 218 D+63.8
Castro 197 100.0% 0 0.0% 197 D+100.0
McMullen 136 69.0% 58 29.4% 3 197 D+39.6
Cottle 184 95.3% 5 2.6% 4 193 D+92.7
Lipscomb 143 74.1% 50 25.9% 193 D+48.2
Crosby 186 96.9% 2 1.0% 4 192 D+95.8
Irion 182 96.3% 7 3.7% 189 D+92.6
Wheeler 168 98.2% 3 1.8% 171 D+96.5
Zavala 153 90.5% 16 9.5% 169 D+81.1
Martin 164 98.8% 2 1.2% 166 D+97.6
Carson 142 91.6% 9 5.8% 4 155 D+85.8
Roberts 142 93.4% 8 5.3% 2 152 D+88.2
Sherman 144 98.0% 3 2.0% 147 D+95.9
Hutchinson 130 98.5% 2 1.5% 132 D+97.0
Moore 122 98.4% 1 0.8% 1 124 D+97.6
King 122 100.0% 0 0.0% 122 D+100.0
Ector 115 95.0% 3 2.5% 3 121 D+92.6
Ochiltree 120 100.0% 0 0.0% 120 D+100.0
Gray 119 100.0% 0 0.0% 119 D+100.0
Glasscock 95 89.6% 11 10.4% 106 D+79.2
Hansford 78 78.8% 13 13.1% 8 99 D+65.7
Oldham 75 88.2% 9 10.6% 1 85 D+77.6

Counties as they stood in 1902; some have since been split, merged or renamed. Margin: the Democrat's share of all votes minus the Republican's. Sources and how the results were checked.

Texas governor elections we hold

YearWinnerMargin
2022 Greg Abbott (R) R+10.9
2018 Abbott (R) R+13.3
2014 Greg Abbott (R) R+20.4
2010 Rick Perry (R) R+12.7
2006 Rick Perry (R) R+9.2
2002 Rick Perry (R) R+17.8
1998 George W. Bush (R) R+37.1
1994 George W. Bush (R) R+7.6
1990 Ann Richards (D) D+2.6
1986 William P. Clements (R) R+6.7
1982 Mark White (D) D+7.3
1978 William P. Clements (R) R+0.7
1974 Dolph Briscoe (D) D+30.3
1972 Dolph Briscoe (D) D+2.9
1970 Preston Smith (D) D+6.9
1968 Preston Smith (D) D+14.0
1966 John B. Connally (D) D+47.0
1964 John B. Connally (D) D+47.8
1962 John B. Connally (D) D+8.4
1960 Price Daniel (D) D+45.5
1958 Price Daniel (D) D+76.2
1956 Price Daniel (D) D+63.2
1954 Allan Shivers (D) D+79.0
1952 Allan Shivers (D) D+98.1
1950 Allan Shivers (D) D+79.9
1948 Beauford H. Jester (D) D+70.0
1946 Beauford H. Jester (D) D+82.5
1944 Coke R. Stevenson (D) D+81.7
1942 Coke R. Stevenson (D) D+93.7
1940 W. Lee O'Daniel (D) D+88.9
1938 W. Lee O'Daniel (D) D+93.8
1936 James V. Allred (D) D+85.9
1934 James V. Allred (D) D+93.4
1932 Miriam A. Ferguson (D) D+24.2
1930 Ross Sterling (D) D+60.4
1928 Dan Moody (D) D+65.0
1926 Dan Moody (D) D+73.8
1924 Miriam A. Ferguson (D) D+17.8
1922 Pat M. Neff (D) D+63.8
1920 Pat Morris Neff (D) D+41.2
1918 William P. Hobby (D) D+68.9
1916 James E. Ferguson (D) D+68.1
1914 James E. Ferguson (D) D+76.7
1912 Oscar Branch Colquitt (D) D+70.5
1910 Oscar Branch Colquitt (D) D+67.8
1908 Thomas Mitchell Campbell (D) D+48.4
1906 Thomas M. Campbell (D) D+68.1
1904 S. W. T. Lanham (D) D+53.3
1902 Samuel W.T. Lanham (D) D+56.5
1900 Joseph D. Sayers (D) D+42.4
1898 Joseph D. Sayers (D) D+71.2
1896 Charles A. Culberson (D) D+55.4
1894 Charles A. Culberson (D) D+36.1
1892 James S. Hogg (D) D+43.4
1890 James S. Hogg (D) D+53.8
1888 Lawrence S. Ross (D) D+71.8
1886 Lawrence S. Ross (D) D+52.2
1884 John Ireland (D) D+57.2
1882 John Ireland (D) D+59.5
1880 Oran M. Roberts (D) D+38.5
1878 Oran M. Roberts (D) D+56.8
1876 Richard Coke (D) D+50.0
1873 Richard Coke (D) D+31.6
1869 Edmund J. Davis (R) R+50.2
1866 James W. Throckmorton (D) D+60.3