United States Presidential election7 Nov 2028in 729 days Senate D 97% House D 58% Calendar Track record Research
Closest results
Election 1932 Results

Each election opens in its own mode: the forecast before the votes are counted, the live count while races are still too close to call, and the results once every race is decided.

1932 US Senate election in South Dakota

Peter Norbeck (Republican) beat U.S.G. Cherry (Democrat) in South Dakota in 1932, 53.8% to 44.6%, a margin of 9.3 points and 26,114 votes.

The Republican hold continued from 1926, when Peter Norbeck also won.

Republicans led in 51 of the 69 counties as they stood then and Democrats in 18. The largest, Minnehaha, cast 22,910 votes and went to the Democrat by 3.0 points. The closest was Sully, where 3 votes separated the two parties.

United States
If only voted How this works
If the polls miss like

Early projection, based on early and incomplete polling: the likely matchups, each weighted by the betting markets' odds of both nominations, not a result. Each county is its 2024 presidential margin moved by its state's projected swing; set a national vote and every state, district and county moves by the same amount from our projection. Colours run in 100 steps from a safe Republican to a safe Democratic margin. Boundaries: US Census Bureau.

Senate

CandidatePartyVotesShare
Peter Norbeck won Republican 151,845 53.8%
U.S.G. Cherry Democratic 125,731 44.6%
All other candidates 4,516 1.6%
Total282,092

Every county

CountyDemocratRepublicanOthersTotalMargin
Minnehaha 11,705 51.1% 11,007 48.0% 198 22,910 D+3.0
Brown 6,249 47.3% 6,784 51.3% 182 13,215 R+4.0
Beadle 4,478 49.0% 4,614 50.5% 42 9,134 R+1.5
Pennington 3,905 44.7% 4,799 54.9% 31 8,735 R+10.2
Davison 3,353 45.4% 4,014 54.3% 26 7,393 R+8.9
Codington 3,341 46.3% 3,844 53.2% 37 7,222 R+7.0
Charles Mix 3,751 55.4% 2,986 44.1% 31 6,768 D+11.3
Lawrence 2,668 40.0% 3,971 59.6% 29 6,668 R+19.5
Yankton 3,697 56.3% 2,853 43.4% 22 6,572 D+12.8
Brookings 2,133 32.8% 4,320 66.4% 56 6,509 R+33.6
Spink 2,069 32.1% 4,270 66.2% 112 6,451 R+34.1
Roberts 2,384 38.6% 2,816 45.6% 969 6,169 R+7.0
Day 2,637 43.1% 3,170 51.8% 314 6,121 R+8.7
Lincoln 1,872 34.5% 3,534 65.1% 21 5,427 R+30.6
Turner 2,352 44.2% 2,933 55.2% 32 5,317 R+10.9
Lake 2,299 43.7% 2,927 55.6% 38 5,264 R+11.9
Hutchinson 2,421 47.4% 2,646 51.9% 36 5,103 R+4.4
Kingsbury 1,610 32.4% 3,315 66.7% 47 4,972 R+34.3
Union 2,160 44.4% 2,688 55.3% 16 4,864 R+10.9
Bon Homme 2,425 50.5% 2,359 49.1% 16 4,800 D+1.4
Tripp 2,532 54.1% 2,133 45.6% 13 4,678 D+8.5
Clay 1,738 38.6% 2,725 60.6% 36 4,499 R+21.9
Meade 1,750 38.9% 2,658 59.1% 91 4,499 R+20.2
Grant 2,152 48.3% 2,270 50.9% 36 4,458 R+2.6
Gregory 2,567 58.6% 1,800 41.1% 10 4,377 D+17.5
McCook 2,087 47.7% 2,236 51.1% 51 4,374 R+3.4
Clark 1,850 44.0% 2,333 55.4% 26 4,209 R+11.5
Hand 1,561 38.3% 2,492 61.1% 26 4,079 R+22.8
Fall River 1,732 44.6% 2,104 54.2% 45 3,881 R+9.6
Edmunds 1,919 51.0% 1,829 48.6% 15 3,763 D+2.4
Moody 1,938 51.5% 1,796 47.8% 27 3,761 D+3.8
Miner 1,613 47.6% 1,691 49.9% 88 3,392 R+2.3
Perkins 1,052 31.4% 2,203 65.7% 98 3,353 R+34.3
Corson 1,671 49.9% 1,532 45.7% 148 3,351 D+4.1
Marshall 1,195 36.1% 1,397 42.2% 721 3,313 R+6.1
Butte 1,301 39.7% 1,921 58.6% 57 3,279 R+18.9
Hughes 1,391 42.5% 1,864 56.9% 19 3,274 R+14.4
Sanborn 1,357 41.6% 1,892 57.9% 16 3,265 R+16.4
Brule 1,415 43.5% 1,820 56.0% 16 3,251 R+12.5
Hamlin 1,318 40.9% 1,886 58.6% 17 3,221 R+17.6
McPherson 1,682 52.2% 1,506 46.8% 32 3,220 D+5.5
Walworth 1,598 49.8% 1,594 49.6% 20 3,212 D+0.1
Aurora 1,340 41.9% 1,851 57.8% 9 3,200 R+16.0
Douglas 1,180 39.0% 1,787 59.1% 58 3,025 R+20.1
Faulk 863 30.1% 1,995 69.5% 11 2,869 R+39.5
Deuel 1,103 40.5% 1,599 58.7% 24 2,726 R+18.2
Lyman 1,063 39.3% 1,625 60.1% 16 2,704 R+20.8
Jerauld 828 31.4% 1,790 67.9% 20 2,638 R+36.5
Custer 1,025 40.9% 1,464 58.5% 15 2,504 R+17.5
Potter 1,047 45.0% 1,267 54.4% 15 2,329 R+9.4
Dewey 1,291 56.6% 973 42.7% 15 2,279 D+14.0
Hanson 1,045 47.1% 1,156 52.0% 20 2,221 R+5.0
Mellette 1,058 48.0% 1,132 51.4% 12 2,202 R+3.4
Haakon 814 37.6% 1,146 52.9% 205 2,165 R+15.3
Todd 1,091 56.7% 826 42.9% 7 1,924 D+13.8
Campbell 619 33.7% 1,210 65.9% 7 1,836 R+32.2
Bennett 716 42.0% 961 56.3% 29 1,706 R+14.4
Hyde 521 33.0% 1,045 66.1% 15 1,581 R+33.1
Sully 765 49.2% 768 49.4% 23 1,556 R+0.2
Ziebach 774 52.9% 669 45.8% 19 1,462 D+7.2
Jones 538 37.7% 870 60.9% 20 1,428 R+23.2
Harding 351 25.3% 981 70.7% 56 1,388 R+45.4
Stanley 585 44.4% 722 54.7% 12 1,319 R+10.4
Jackson 477 36.4% 808 61.7% 24 1,309 R+25.3
Shannon 653 52.1% 598 47.7% 3 1,254 D+4.4
Buffalo 455 50.4% 443 49.1% 4 902 D+1.3
Washabaugh (Ext) 337 46.1% 384 52.5% 10 731 R+6.4
Washington (Ext) 247 50.0% 243 49.2% 4 494 D+0.8
Armstrong (Ext) 17 100.0% 0 0.0% 17 D+100.0

Counties as they stood in 1932; some have since been split, merged or renamed. Margin: the Democrat's share of all votes minus the Republican's. Sources and how the results were checked.

South Dakota Senate elections we hold

YearWinnerMargin
2022 John R Thune (R) R+43.5
2020 Mike Rounds (R) R+31.5
2016 John R. Thune (R) R+43.7
2014 Mike Rounds (R) R+20.9
2010 John Thune (R) R+100.0
2008 Tim Johnson (D) D+25.0
2004 John Thune (R) R+1.2
2002 Tim Johnson (D) D+0.2
1998 Tom Daschle (D) D+25.7
1996 Tim Johnson (D) D+2.6
1992 Thomas A. Daschle (D) D+32.4
1990 Larry Pressler (R) R+7.3
1986 Thomas A. Daschle (D) D+3.2
1984 Larry Pressler (R) R+49.0
1980 James Abdnor (R) R+18.8
1978 Larry Pressler (R) R+33.7
1974 George McGovern (D) D+6.1
1972 James Abourezk (D) D+14.1
1968 George McGovern (D) D+13.6
1966 Karl E. Mundt (R) R+32.6
1962 George McGovern (D) D+0.2
1960 Karl E. Mundt (R) R+4.9
1956 Francis Case (R) R+1.6
1954 Karl E. Mundt (R) R+14.6
1950 Francis Case (R) R+27.8
1948 Karl E. Mundt (R) R+18.7
1944 Chandler Gurney (R) R+27.7
1942 Harlan J. Bushfield (R) R+17.5
1938 Chandler Gurney (R) R+4.9
1936 William J. Bulow (D) D+2.1
1932 Peter Norbeck (R) R+9.3
1930 William J. Bulow (D) D+3.3
1926 Peter Norbeck (R) R+26.2
1924 William H. McMaster (R) R+13.3
1920 Peter Norbeck (R) R+30.1
1918 Thomas Sterling (R) R+16.1
1914 Edwin S. Johnson (D) D+3.5