United States Presidential election7 Nov 2028in 729 days Senate D 97% House D 58% Calendar Track record Research
Closest results
Election 1888 Results

Each election opens in its own mode: the forecast before the votes are counted, the live count while races are still too close to call, and the results once every race is decided.

1888 Alabama governor election

Thomas Seay (Democrat) beat W. T. Ewing (Republican) in Alabama in 1888, 77.6% to 22.2%, a margin of 55.4 points and 106,786 votes.

The Democratic hold continued from 1886, when Thomas Seay also won.

Democrats led in 62 of the 65 counties as they stood then and Republicans in 3. The largest, Jefferson, cast 9,976 votes and went to the Democrat by 43.5 points. The closest was Lawrence, where 31 votes separated the two parties.

United States
If only voted How this works
If the polls miss like

Early projection, based on early and incomplete polling: the likely matchups, each weighted by the betting markets' odds of both nominations, not a result. Each county is its 2024 presidential margin moved by its state's projected swing; set a national vote and every state, district and county moves by the same amount from our projection. Colours run in 100 steps from a safe Republican to a safe Democratic margin. Boundaries: US Census Bureau.

Governor

CandidatePartyVotesShare
Thomas Seay won Democratic 149,591 77.6%
W. T. Ewing Republican 42,805 22.2%
All other candidates 301 0.2%
Total192,697

Every county

CountyDemocratRepublicanOthersTotalMargin
Jefferson 7,122 71.4% 2,780 27.9% 74 9,976 D+43.5
Dallas 8,712 93.1% 643 6.9% 9,355 D+86.3
Montgomery 4,979 75.1% 1,648 24.9% 6,627 D+50.3
Lowndes 4,232 74.7% 1,432 25.3% 5,664 D+49.4
Mobile 3,764 69.2% 1,672 30.8% 5,436 D+38.5
Madison 3,015 57.5% 2,229 42.5% 5,244 D+15.0
Hale 4,262 86.0% 695 14.0% 4,957 D+72.0
Barbour 4,561 96.8% 153 3.2% 4,714 D+93.5
Marengo 3,906 85.9% 639 14.1% 4,545 D+71.9
Wilcox 4,463 100.0% 0 0.0% 4,463 D+100.0
Calhoun 3,231 79.8% 819 20.2% 4,050 D+59.6
Talladega 2,267 56.9% 1,716 43.1% 1 3,984 D+13.8
Jackson 2,624 66.2% 1,324 33.4% 14 3,962 D+32.8
Henry 3,924 99.3% 28 0.7% 3,952 D+98.6
Butler 2,098 56.4% 1,602 43.1% 21 3,721 D+13.3
Chambers 2,046 57.2% 1,534 42.8% 3,580 D+14.3
Tuscaloosa 2,598 76.7% 785 23.2% 6 3,389 D+53.5
Pike 2,668 79.1% 703 20.9% 3,371 D+58.3
Elmore 1,882 56.0% 1,481 44.0% 3,363 D+11.9
Perry 2,988 90.3% 320 9.7% 3,308 D+80.7
Lawrence 1,631 49.5% 1,662 50.4% 5 3,298 R+0.9
Tallapoosa 2,789 88.2% 374 11.8% 3,163 D+76.4
Etowah 2,382 75.4% 778 24.6% 3,160 D+50.8
Lee 2,067 65.9% 1,069 34.1% 3,136 D+31.8
Pickens 3,087 100.0% 1 0.0% 3,088 D+99.9
Cherokee 2,850 93.0% 210 6.9% 4 3,064 D+86.2
Clarke 2,109 69.1% 944 30.9% 3,053 D+38.2
Russell 1,873 62.5% 1,126 37.5% 2,999 D+24.9
Shelby 1,859 62.3% 1,126 37.7% 2,985 D+24.6
Colbert 1,337 48.9% 1,396 51.0% 3 2,736 R+2.2
Blount 2,290 83.8% 442 16.2% 1 2,733 D+67.6
Morgan 1,836 69.9% 675 25.7% 116 2,627 D+44.2
Walker 1,316 51.5% 1,237 48.5% 2,553 D+3.1
Crenshaw 2,035 85.9% 334 14.1% 2,369 D+71.8
Marshall 2,074 89.3% 238 10.2% 11 2,323 D+79.0
St. Clair 1,600 69.4% 705 30.6% 2,305 D+38.8
Greene 1,559 67.8% 741 32.2% 2,300 D+35.6
Dale 2,192 97.4% 58 2.6% 2,250 D+94.8
Bullock 1,860 84.7% 337 15.3% 2,197 D+69.3
Chilton 1,725 79.5% 445 20.5% 2,170 D+59.0
Lamar 1,847 85.4% 316 14.6% 2,163 D+70.8
Bibb 1,765 81.9% 387 17.9% 4 2,156 D+63.9
Lauderdale 2,112 99.6% 9 0.4% 2,121 D+99.2
Randolph 1,418 67.0% 698 33.0% 2,116 D+34.0
De Kalb 1,617 79.0% 431 21.0% 2,048 D+57.9
Limestone 1,946 95.4% 60 2.9% 33 2,039 D+92.5
Clay 1,621 80.6% 389 19.4% 2,010 D+61.3
Conecuh 1,201 63.4% 694 36.6% 1,895 D+26.8
Coffee 1,859 98.7% 25 1.3% 1,884 D+97.3
Fayette 1,346 80.5% 326 19.5% 1,672 D+61.0
Monroe 1,391 83.7% 271 16.3% 1,662 D+67.4
Cullman 1,099 67.2% 536 32.8% 1 1,636 D+34.4
Macon 1,314 80.4% 320 19.6% 1,634 D+60.8
Franklin 1,359 84.8% 234 14.6% 9 1,602 D+70.2
Marion 1,262 81.5% 286 18.5% 1,548 D+63.0
Coosa 1,494 100.0% 0 0.0% 1,494 D+100.0
Baldwin 1,022 68.8% 464 31.2% 1,486 D+37.6
Cleburne 1,369 96.2% 54 3.8% 1,423 D+92.4
Geneva 1,419 100.0% 0 0.0% 1,419 D+100.0
Covington 1,294 96.3% 50 3.7% 1,344 D+92.6
Autauga 1,111 85.9% 182 14.1% 1,293 D+71.8
Escambia 803 71.0% 328 29.0% 1,131 D+42.0
Washington 931 84.6% 169 15.4% 1,100 D+69.3
Choctaw 922 96.2% 36 3.8% 958 D+92.5
Winston 257 37.0% 438 63.0% 695 R+26.0

Counties as they stood in 1888; some have since been split, merged or renamed. Margin: the Democrat's share of all votes minus the Republican's. Sources and how the results were checked.

Alabama governor elections we hold

YearWinnerMargin
2022 Kay Ivey (R) R+37.8
2018 Kay Ivey (R) R+19.1
2014 Robert Bentley (R) R+27.3
2010 Robert Bentley (R) R+15.7
2006 Robert Riley (R) R+15.9
2002 Robert Riley (R) R+0.2
1998 Don Siegelman (D) D+15.6
1994 Fob James (R) R+0.9
1990 Guy Hunt (R) R+4.2
1986 Guy Hunt (R) R+12.9
1982 George C. Wallace (D) D+18.6
1978 Fob James (D) D+46.7
1974 George C. Wallace (D) D+68.4
1970 George Wallace (D) D+74.5
1966 Lurleen Burns Wallace (D) D+32.4
1962 George C. Wallace (D) D+96.3
1958 John Malcolm Patterson (D) D+76.8
1954 Jim Folsom (D) D+46.7
1950 Gordon Persons (D) D+82.2
1946 James E. Folsom (D) D+77.3
1942 Chauncey Sparks (D) D+78.4
1938 Frank M. Dixon (D) D+74.9
1934 Bibb Graves (D) D+74.3
1930 Benjamin M. Miller (D) D+61.8
1926 Bibb Graves (D) D+62.4
1922 William W. Brandon (D) D+56.3
1918 Thomas Kilby (D) D+80.2
1914 Charles Henderson (D) D+63.6
1910 Emmet O'Neal (D) D+60.4
1906 Braxton B. Comer (D) D+71.5
1902 William D. Jelks (D) D+47.4
1900 William J. Samford (D) D+53.6
1898 Joseph F. Johnston (D) D+65.1
1896 Joseph F. Johnston (D) D+59.0
1894 William C. Oates (D) D+57.1
1892 Thomas G. Jones (D) D+52.2
1890 Thomas G. Jones (D) D+53.1
1888 Thomas Seay (D) D+55.4
1886 Thomas Seay (D) D+59.3
1884 Edward A. O'Neal (D) D+99.7
1882 Edward A. O'Neal (D) D+37.4
1880 Rufus W. Cobb (D) D+76.1
1878 Rufus W. Cobb (D) D+100.0
1876 George S. Houston (D) D+31.6
1874 George S. Houston (D) D+6.6
1872 David P. Lewis (R) R+5.0
1870 Robert B. Lindsay (D) D+0.9
1868 William Hugh Smith (R) R+100.0
1865 Robert M. Patton (other)