All countries · Try it · Electoral system swap
Same votes, different rules
The rules that turn votes into seats can matter as much as the votes. Take any country's votes and count them the way another country does.
Netherlands, our forecast
PRO largest, 49 short
Under the UK's rules
PRO largest, 5 short
PRO 18% · 27 → 71 PVV 12% · 20 → 22 JA21 12% · 18 → 18 D66 11% · 17 → 16 VVD 10% · 15 → 11 CDA 8% · 13 → 7 FvD 8% · 12 → 5 50PLUS 3% · 5 → 0 PvdD 3% · 5 → 0 SP 3% · 4 → 0 CU 3% · 3 → 0 SGP 2% · 3 → 0 Volt 2% · 3 → 0 DENK 2% · 3 → 0 BBB 1% · 2 → 0 DNA 0% · 0 → 0
Netherlands' votes under every country's rules 150 seats, 76 for a majority
Seat by seat
| Party | Votes | Our forecast | FPTP |  FPTP |  Preferential |  Two-round |  PR 5% | Pure PR |  PR districts |  PR small districts |  Bonus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRO | 18.4% | 27 | 71 | 71 | 71 | 71 | 35 | 28 | 41 | 52 | 31 |
| PVV | 12.4% | 20 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 23 | 19 | 41 | 52 | 21 |
| JA21 | 11.6% | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 22 | 18 | 41 | 46 | 20 |
| D66 | 11.1% | 17 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 21 | 17 | 27 | 0 | 19 |
| VVD | 9.8% | 15 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
| CDA | 8.5% | 13 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 16 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
| FvD | 7.6% | 12 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 14 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| 50PLUS | 3.5% | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| PvdD | 3.3% | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| SP | 3.1% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| CU | 2.7% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SGP | 2.4% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Volt | 2.1% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DENK | 2.1% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BBB | 1.3% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DNA | 0.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The systems
- The UK: First past the post. 650 single-member seats: the biggest party in each wins. Here: the cube law (seats in proportion to the cube of the vote).
- Canada: First past the post. Single-member ridings, as in the UK. Here: the cube law.
- Australia: Preferential vote. Single-member seats won with half the votes after preferences. Here: the cube law, which preferences soften in practice.
- France: Two rounds. Single-member seats, a run-off where no one wins half. Here: the cube law.
- Germany: Proportional, 5% threshold. Seats in proportion to the party vote (Sainte-Laguë) for parties with 5% or more.
- The Netherlands: Pure proportional. One national list vote: seats in proportion (D'Hondt), no threshold beyond one seat's worth.
- Poland: Proportional in 41 districts. D'Hondt in 41 districts with a 5% national threshold; mid-sized districts favour bigger parties.
- Spain: Proportional in 52 small districts. D'Hondt in 52 provinces of about seven seats, 3% threshold; small districts favour the biggest parties strongly.
- Italy: Majority bonus. A party with 42% or more takes 70 extra seats per 400, up to 55% of the chamber; the rest proportional with a 3% threshold.
Each is applied to the national vote shares shown (parties grouped as "others" left out), with Netherlands's own number of seats. These are stand-ins: real single-member and district systems depend on where each party's votes are, and voters and parties would behave differently under other rules. Read it as the same votes counted another way, not a forecast. "Our forecast" is Netherlands under its real rules.